You are just starting to read one of the most explosive articles we have ever published.
What we are telling you in this article for your convenience is guaranteed to often derail your facial features.
Often enough, our mouths remained open during the research work. So let's start: Do you actually know which country you live in here?
Do you also believe that the “BRD” is a state, that you are a citizen of the “BRD”, that the policeman who greets you in a traffic stop, or the judge who handles your divorce proceedings, or clarifies the circumstances after a traffic accident, Officials of the state “BRD” are?
Do you believe that as a citizen of the state “BRD” you are liable to pay taxes to this “state BRD” and that the “BRD” is a “constitutional state”?
You haven't noticed yet that your “identity card” and your passport do not contain any nationality at all?
There you will find the entry “GERMAN” under the heading “Citizenship”, but it is well known that there is no country called “GERMAN”!
And anyway! Why do you have an identity card? Whose staff are you?
The representatives of the older generation may remember that there used to be personal ID cards or identity cards.
You may not know either that those responsible for the “FRG” system deliberately failed to adopt a constitution for Germany in 1990 and that the “Basic Law” is anything but a constitution?
Perhaps you do not know what goals were pursued and what consequences this has for each and every one of us?
Perhaps you still believe that the “FRG” is a sovereign state, that the occupation law has long ceased to apply, and that the top representatives of the “FRD” system represent the interests of the “little man” in Germany?
You can just as well believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or even in the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm, because none of this is true.
Of course, there are now numerous works in bookshops and on corresponding websites that have taken on this topic, perhaps you have already come across one or the other work.
It is practically impossible to find concise, well-structured, factual, legally quotable, and yet easily understandable literature on this topic.
The following discussion is intended to at least partially close this gap.
Incidentally, the following legal contexts are not about “legal secret knowledge”. But on the contrary!
Anyone who can read can research all the facts presented and understand them in the simplest possible way.
At this point we would like to express the wish that the interested reader should simply not believe anything that is described in the present essay.
Rather, it is expressly asked that the readers research everything themselves and check it themselves.
Due to the aim of making this topic easy to understand, this treatise naturally makes no claim to completeness.
Rather, it can be safely assumed that the following essay is just the famous tip of the iceberg.
After this somewhat longer introduction, let's get started:
The population of the local country is pretended that it is the Federal Republic of Germany and a state. But that's not the case, because basically the thing is:
The FRG is the simulation of a state!
The alleged “Federal Republic of Germany” is a company which calls itself BRD-Finanzagentur-GmbH. So a company.
Do you know what the so-called “Bundestag” is? Correct! Another company.
How can you tell that, you ask? Very easily!
The so-called Bundestag has a tax number that reads as follows: DE 122119035
Tax numbers are only available for companies, legal entities, and flat-rate farmers and foresters, which proves that the Bundestag must be a company - to be more precise, a theater in which theater is played: The one play “government” - the others play “opposition”.
Let's get to some other interesting information:
If you z. B. If a fine notice should be received, then it comes with a formal delivery (yellow letter).
The procedure after receiving a "formal delivery" in the mailbox is as follows: Do not open!
Send the letter or the "registered mail" with the note "Return to sender" to the post office no later than the tenth day after the date stated on the envelope.
Under no circumstances should you accept “delivery registered mail” from the postman / postman, but refuse to accept it! Nobody is obliged to accept registered mail!
“And what's that supposed to do? I have to pay anyway ”, you will surely ask and say now.
No! You don't have to, because there is no legal basis for this - especially not if such a letter is simply thrown into your mailbox, because the thing is:
A formal delivery (“yellow letter”) must be handed over personally to the addressee by an official.
The (illegally) privatized Deutsche Post AG does not meet this mandatory condition, as unfortunately no civil servants work there.
Since 29.09.1990/XNUMX/XNUMX it has no longer been possible for the authorities of the "FRG" to deliver official letters with legal effect. So please always return official letters unopened to the sender.
You may then have a visit from a young man one sunny day wearing a funny jacket with the word “justice” on it.
He would like to deliver the letter to you personally, but unfortunately that doesn't work either - and do you know why that doesn't work?
This is not because this young man is unfortunately not a civil servant either, so he cannot deliver the letter to you in accordance with the law either. Stupid thing that.
In the end, they'll see that you're not as stupid as they'd like, and they'll leave you alone.
By the way! The Germans don't even know that they don't even have citizenship. “Why not?” You will probably ask yourself. Very easily!
Take a look at your identity card. What does nationality mean there? Correct! GERMAN!
But there is no country that is called “German”, or do you perhaps know such a country !?
In almost all of Europe, the relevant country (Italy, Austria, etc.) is stated on the ID cards. In German federal identity cards it says crude: “GERMAN”.
In the past there were personal ID cards in which a confused nationality was sometimes mentioned, but at least there were personal ID cards and no ID cards:
Your identity card, which you personally have, is not simply called “Federal identity card”, but because you belong to the staff of the BRD-Finanzagentur-GmbH - and do you know who made you the staff of this company? Very easily! Herself!
You applied for the ID yourself, so basically asked to be hired by this company.
In the former Roman Empire, slaves, if they could write, had to sign a certificate in CAPITAL LETTERS that they belong to the slave owner.
And now look again in your federal identity card to see how your name is written there. Correct! In UPPER CASE, of course. And now you guess why ?!
Have you ever been stopped by the police and had to pay a fine?
You should not have had to endure any of this, because there is neither an applicable administrative offense law in this country, nor are there police officers.
“Why not that?” You ask? Very easily!
Article 3 of the Second Clearing Act repealed the Act on Authorization to Issue Statutory Orders.
Among other things, the Introductory Act (EC) to the Administrative Offenses Act (Owig), which contained the scope of application (decided on October 11, 10, canceled on November 2007, 25. Legal force / legal validity with announcement in the Federal Law Gazette on November 11.2007, 29, Part I) was repealed , P. 11 ff.)
The "police" meanwhile refer to Section 36, Paragraph 5, of the Road Traffic Regulations [StVO] when checking vehicles. But an order is not a law and therefore has no legal force.
Article 57 - Repeal of the Introductory Act to the Administrative Offenses Act:
"The Introductory Act to the Law on Administrative Offenses of May 24, 1968 (BGBl., I, p. 503), last amended by Article 25 of the Act of December 13, 2001 (BGBl., I, p. 3574), is repealed." (Federal Law Gazette, November 29, 11, Part I, p. 2007 ff.)
Unless otherwise stipulated by law, administrative offenses can only be punished if they are committed within the territorial scope of this law or outside this scope on a ship or in an aircraft that is entitled to use the federal flag or the national emblem of the Federal Republic of Germany.
If, however, there is no longer any area of validity, then there is none outside of the area of validity, since that presupposes an area of validity.
The Administrative Offenses Act is thus null and void!
In other words: The Administrative Offenses Act no longer exists and consequently may no longer be applied.
By the way! What you pretend to be a “police officer” is not really - and you don't know why? Very easily!
There are no civil servants in this country, as civil servants can only be appointed by the state.
The local country in which you live is not a state, but a company. The “Federal Republic of Germany Finance Agency GmbH” is hidden behind the commercial register number HRB 51411.
How can it be that a company exercises sovereign rights, such as collecting and collecting taxes ?!
You got it right! Of course, no company has the right to claim or collect tax money from you! Where would we end up if just any company could ask you to pay taxes ?!
Since this Finanzagentur GmbH has existed since 1990, and since then it has diligently and illegally collected tax money, you can claim back all taxes that you have paid in the last 24 years because these were illegally collected.
We will describe how you can do this in a follow-up article that we will publish on Friday, October 31, 2014.
Police officers ???
Try it yourself! Let a supposed police officer show you his official ID card.
Then he will show you an identity card, but unfortunately not an official identity card, but an official identity card, which unfortunately does not identify him as an official because he is not an official. In fact, employees always work in companies.
The fact that the entire police apparatus in the local country is a company can be seen, among other things, from the fact that they have general terms and conditions. See: Federal Police
Companies or their employees have no authority over third parties. At best, companies can make offers that can be both accepted and rejected.
In other words, don't be impressed by police officers. They have as many powers as you. Namely, NONE!
There used to be official ID cards. The person who thinks he can reprimand you is not a police officer at all and is therefore acting as a private person, which is not at all good, because this person commits two crimes at once - namely, on the one hand, deception in legal transactions and, on the other hand, presumption of authority.
Both are criminal offenses, with which this private person is fully liable with property and freedom.
“Well then I'll sue him” might be an idea that you would come up with now.
You can do that. But you should choose a proper European court outside the local country for this, or hope that the “policeman” does not know that he cannot be cracked by a judge in a local court.
Now you are sure to ask: "Why can't it be cracked by a local court?" Very easily!
It cannot be cracked because there is no criminal procedure code and no legal judges in this country.
We can already imagine what you will ask yourself now: "Why not?"
Quite simply: in this country (as already stated) there are no civil servants and certainly no legal judges.
In the state simulation "BRD" there are no more legal business distribution plans (GVP) in courts and therefore no legal judges.
With the deletion of § 1 Introductory Act (EG) to the Voluntary Jurisdiction Act (FGG) and the elimination of § 15 Courts Constitution Act (GVG) ("Courts are state courts") in 1950, "BRD" - "Courts" no longer have a legally regulated GVP according to § 21 e GVG.
No legal judges according to Article 98, Paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Basic Law are active at “BRD” - “Courts”.
However, according to § 16 GVG, nobody may be withdrawn from the legal judge. Exceptional courts are also not permitted:
"Nobody may be withdrawn from their legal judge." (Article 101, Paragraph 1, GG)
Everyone has the right to be heard: “In court, everyone has the right to be heard” (Art. 103 GG).
There is also no longer a Judicial Constitution Act, as this has been omitted in Section 1 “General Provisions §§ 1”.
The provision was repealed by the First Act on the Adjustment of Federal Law (Bundesbereinigungsgesetz) in the area of responsibility of the Federal Ministry of Justice of April 19.04.2006, XNUMX.
GVG, StPO, ZPO and Owig have been repealed since the end of April 2006 because they no longer have any areas of application.
From this it follows razor-sharp: Without a ZPO, no civil proceedings, no administrative offense proceedings, no proceedings for submitting the affidavit and no other coercive proceedings or enforcement detention are possible.
One of our esteemed readers shared the following with us:
“I was once wrongly convicted by the court and the so-called legal force had come into effect and could therefore no longer raise an objection against it after several instances.
But the so-called legal force had no effect and is null and void. The fine was immediately refunded and everything was canceled.
A law is only valid if it has been assigned a scope. Laws are invalid and void if the requirement of legal certainty is violated, because the thing is again:
The territorial scope of the respective laws was defined in the introductory laws (EG).
With the repeal of the EC, the relevant laws have lost their scope and therefore do not apply anywhere and are therefore null and void (violation of the principle of legal certainty)
[BVerwGE 17, 192 = DVBl. 1964, 147] and against the requirement of certainty [BVerwGE 1 C 74/61 of November 28, 11; 1963 VwVerfG]).
“It is precisely this norm that evaluates the direct interference with the rights of the person concerned, so it must be flawless in every respect under the rule of law.
This includes first and foremost the unconditional clarity and verifiability of their legal scope. ”(BVerfGE IC 74/61 of November 28, 11 [“ Law of Determination ”])
“Everyone must be able to easily determine the spatial scope of a law in order to adjust their behavior accordingly.
A law that raises doubts about this is indefinite and therefore invalid because it violates the requirement of legal certainty.
In this regard, the standard giver must also note that such a standard is generally not aimed at a professionally qualified group of people, so he cannot assume that everyone can adequately understand maps or texts with predominantly legal content. "(BVerwGE 17, 192 = DVBl. 1964, 147 ["requirement of legal certainty"])
The plaintiff was amazed and could not do anything about it. Only when you explain to them that there is no longer any ZPO do they subside. This is clearly popular fraud!
Now I ask myself why there are still courts and so-called resolutions? Do you want to hope that people will not find out about it or that they will engage in a voluntary court and sham judgments?
Obviously they are hoping for it and obviously this reader is absolutely right, because it is true: This is nothing more than deceit against the people, of which the population will, however, find out! News Top-Aktuell is just one of a few other Internet media that bring such facts to the public.
Only judges under Article 101 of the Basic Law are allowed to open a hearing or a meeting.
This means that a citizen can demand the legitimation of a judge.
A police officer actor, whether in uniform or not, whether personally known or not, must legitimize himself to a citizen before any legal action or intervention, if the citizen requests it! No ifs and buts!
Exactly the same applies to a judge. If a citizen demands legitimation, the judges are legally obliged to submit this in writing.
For this reason, over 12 judges were asked in court in the last 1.200 months: “Are you a legal judge according to Article 101 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany and can you identify yourself?”
Interestingly, no one could or wanted to legitimize himself according to the principle of Article 101, which also means that there are no legal judges in the so-called Federal Republic of Germany.
Without observing Articles 101 and 103 (paragraph 1: “Everyone has the right to be heard in court”), every court in the local country is a court martial or a special court (which, however, are inadmissible according to Article 101) as there is no court in the local country follows the legal norms.
Thus a jurisprudence according to constitutional principles in the "FRG" is impossible and all so-called judgments, resolutions, etc. are not legally valid.
This means that the administration of justice has come to a standstill in the "FRG"!
“The FRG is not a constitutional state.” (Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 08/06/2006 [AZ: EGMR 75529/01]).
Legal jurisdiction no longer takes place and is no longer possible. Instead, methodical / systematic presumption of authority, perversion of the law, violation of law and arbitrariness prevail.
Federal German “courts” are outside of the law and are illegal.
The consequences of this are far more than just monstrous, inconceivable and unbelievable!
For example, anyone who went to jail after April 19.04.2006, XNUMX is wrongly imprisoned there, even though he has committed one or more serious offenses and basically has to be released immediately.
Anyone who had their driving license withdrawn after April 19.04.2006, XNUMX should pick it up again as soon as possible, because that too was unlawful.
Basically, all of this already applies from August 29, 1990, because from this date at the latest the local country is no longer a state, but only a state simulation.
Since civil servants can only be appointed by one state and are only allowed to exercise and apply sovereign rights in one state, there have been no civil servants since the end of August 1990.
As a result, someone who was sentenced to prison after August 29, 1990 is simply being held illegally.
Anyone who had their driving license withdrawn after August 29, 1990 should have it returned to them immediately, as this was also illegal.
In short: All "sovereign" and administrative acts in the "Federal Republic of Germany" are legally invalid, legally ineffective (null and void) and unlawful, since since August 29.08.1990, XNUMX there have been no civil servants in this country who are allowed to exercise and apply sovereign rights.
In addition, the "sovereign" and administrative acts are not signed, violate the citation requirement (Article 19, Paragraphs 1 and 2) of the Basic Law and have no scope.
In the "FRG" occupation law still applies
A vivid example of the fact that the occupation law is still in force is the conviction of the GDR foreign exchange procurer Schalck-Golodkowski in 1996 to one year imprisonment on probation.
He was not convicted under the StGB, but under SHAEF Law No. 53 (Occupation Law), which proves that this right was still in force in 1996 and is still in force today.
The so-called “Federal Constitutional Court” had not accepted the “constitutional complaint” from Mr. Schalck-Golodkowski, as German courts cannot appeal against Allied law.
We put the term “Federal Constitutional Court” in quotation marks, because the local country unfortunately has no constitution. So here is a “Federal Constitutional Court” without a constitution + non-legal judges at work who have no power of disposal or decision-making power.
In order to ensure that the interests of the three Western occupying powers are implemented in the occupied area, they had also made a special decree, which has become known in political jargon as the “Chancellor Act”.
The occupying powers ordered behind the backs of the public that the so-called “Federal Chancellor” should come to the Allies in connection with his swearing-in so that they could receive their instructions (so-called “inaugural visits”).
Interestingly, this “Chancellor's File” also stipulates that the Allies will have media sovereignty in the occupied area until 2099.
You haven't even voted ...
In addition, the seizure of the gold reserves of the German Reich (approx. 4.000 tons) by the Allies is documented in this document. So-called "Federal Chancellors" are not only infamous liars and highly criminal state pretenders, but also the top extras who defend their interests the occupying powers have to enforce against the local population.
Perhaps it is now also clearer why the citizens of the local country can save themselves any participation in political elections, since the strings are completely different people.
If you take part in political elections in this country, you can at best ensure that elected political criminals or criminal actors have taken care of forever.
In addition, one can only be guilty of complicity in public treason, but a citizen of the local country cannot achieve more with his little cross on the ballot paper.
In summary, it must be stated that the supreme power of government in the occupied area is still exercised by the three western occupying powers.
The administrative structure “BRD” created for this purpose is the extended arm of the three western occupying powers.
The upper representatives of the “FRG” are the vicarious agents and representatives of the interests of these occupying powers.
The “government” of the “FRG” is therefore merely a sham or puppet government. They are employees of the occupying powers - nothing more.
It must therefore be concluded that the criterion of its own state authority is not met by the “FRG”.
The “FRG” is therefore not a state simply because of the lack of this characteristic of the three-element theory, which is necessary under international law!
Since it is not a state, there can only be companies here that have no right to exercise and apply sovereign rights.
In other words: There are no legal judges in this country, no police and other officials, no duty to be condemned or harassed by the same, and no duty to pay taxes just to draw a few conclusions from the big picture.
Does the Basic Law even apply?
Since 1990 the highest legal norm, the so-called “Basic Law”, is no longer defined in its territorial scope.
Previously there was Article 23 (old version) in which the territorial scope was defined. Here you can take note of the before and after:
Article 23 of the Basic Law; old and new version
https://at.wikimannia.org/Artikel_23_des_Grundgesetzes_f%c3%bcr_die_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland
Since the new version of Article 23 does not apply to the Basic Law, it is basically null and void.
The Basic Law was rendered ineffective
The Federal Constitutional Court once ruled that judgments made outside the scope of Article 23 of the Basic Law are absolutely invalid.
Article 23 GG was covered
It is customary in the legislation that a “(not applicable)” or “(repealed)” is set in the case of repealed paragraphs and new paragraphs are appended with a new number, possibly with appended lower case letters.
With the Europe article, the old article 23 is “covered”. Anyone holding a new version of the Basic Law will find no reference to the repealed Article 23.
One hears and reads from propaganda liars again and again that scopes of application are not even necessary, since it goes without saying that laws have to apply to the respective country.
But is that really the case ??? Let's take a look at the whole thing in the light.
The Federal Republic does not have its own constitution, as is customary in every other state in the world.
This is not only reflected in the name (Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany), because the “Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany” would be correct, but is also used literally in the old preamble until 29.09.1990/XNUMX/XNUMX:
"... in order to give state life a new order for a transitional period, this Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany was passed by virtue of its constituent power."
The founding fathers of the Basic Law did not intend to create a constitution for Germany in 1949, as can be inferred from the old Article 146 of the Basic Law (this was also adapted on September 29.09.1990, XNUMX):
“This Basic Law loses its validity on the day on which a constitution comes into force that has been freely decided by the German people”.
So if the area of validity of the Basic Law need not be anchored in the Basic Law, why did the founding fathers include the old Article 23 of the Basic Law if a definition of the area of validity did not seem necessary to them?
Let's get to another oddity:
In the original Article 23 of the Basic Law it said:
“This Basic Law initially applies in the area of the states of Baden, Bavaria, Bremen, Greater Berlin, Hamburg, Hesse, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland Palatinate, Schleswig-Holstein, Württemberg-Baden and Württemberg-Hohenzollern. In other parts of Germany it is to be put into effect after their accession ”.
On September 29.09.1990, XNUMX, this passage was deleted from the Basic Law without replacement.
On October 03.10.1990rd, XNUMX the accession (reunification of Germany) of the former Central German areas (called GDR) took place.
At this point in time, Article 23 GG no longer existed in the Basic Law.
In other words: The Basic Law never came into force in the new federal states, as the passage - “In other parts of Germany, it is to be put into effect after their accession” - on 29.09.1990/4/XNUMX, i.e. XNUMX days before the new federal states join , was already deleted without replacement.
But it gets even better!
Topic: Rundfunkstaatsvertrag (RfStV)! Apart from the fact that state treaties can only be concluded with other states, and not a state with itself, the following question must also be asked:
How can the broadcasting ”state contract” be valid if the scope of the Basic Law was abolished on July 18.07.1990, XNUMX !?
Every law requires a clearly defined scope in order to be legally and physically effective. If this does not exist, that law is suspended. This has been here since 1990 !!! The so-called "Rundfunkstaatsvertrag" lacks any legal basis.
And now it gets EVEN BETTER!
On July 17.07.1990, 2 the Allied victorious powers of WWII decreed, during the Paris Conference, in addition to the repeal of the "Constitution of the GDR", the deletion of the preamble and Article 23 of the "Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany".
With the territorial scope of application, the "Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany" as a whole lost its validity with effect from July 18.07.1990, XNUMX
With the deletion of Article 23 by US Secretary of State James Baker in Paris before the accession of the new states, not only the "Basic Law", but the "Federal Republic of Germany" itself, as a provisional state structure, expired on July 17.07.1990, XNUMX.
With the deletion of Article 23 (old version) of the “Basic Law”, the “FRG” actually ceased to exist and the acting politicians lost their legitimacy.
Thus, all contracts that were concluded by (unauthorized) German politicians after the date of the Paris Conference are void under international and international law!
This also applies, for example, to the "Unification Treaty": According to international law, contracts that violate the norms of international law are void (see Article 53 of the "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties" of May 23, 1969, ratified by the "FRG" on 20.08.1987/XNUMX/XNUMX):
Article 53 - Treaties in contravention of an overriding norm of general international law (ius cogens):
A contract is null and void if, at the time of its conclusion, it contradicts an overriding standard of general international law.
It conforms to international norms that only legally legitimized persons who have power of representation can conclude contracts.
These contracts must not conflict with other, higher-level standards.
Evidently, however, since Article 23 (old version) was deleted on August 31, 1990, the day the “Unification Treaty” was signed, this paragraph no longer existed, as it was deleted on July 17.07.1990, XNUMX.
This means that Paragraph 1 of the “Unification Treaty” (accession according to Art. 23 old version “GG”) could hardly have been implemented.
The “Basic Law”, which for its part has never been ratified either and only became a kind of customary law in the “FRG” through “factual submission”, cannot, however, as a “substitute constitution” refer to an explicit spatial definition of its scope of application (as in the old Art . 23) waive.
As the highest right, it has to make these basic provisions itself. This is currently no longer the case and so the alleged "FRG" is only a non-governmental organization. This means that all legal bases for ongoing proceedings according to StPO, ZPO, OwiG, AO etc. are no longer applicable, so that a decision can no longer be based on this.
The procedures are therefore all to be discontinued, unless legitimation is provided by the standard giver.
Arguments such as “with the normative force of the factual”, “customary law” or similar arguments that appear to be embarrassed are inadmissible.
Since the entire jurisprudence in the "FRG" was based on the "Basic Law" and in the "GDR" on the basis of the local constitution, a consequent continuation of the idea clearly and unequivocally resulted in a standstill in the administration of justice .
Further facts for our esteemed readers:
In the "Treaty on the Final Regulations Regarding Germany" from 1990 it says:
"Art. 1 (1) The united Germany will include the areas of the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic and all of Berlin ... "
According to the wording and the meaning, the FRG, the GDR and Berlin became a state called "The United Germany".
Article 8 of this contract states:
“The ratification takes place on the German side by the unified Germany. This treaty applies to the united Germany. "
In article 10 you can read:
"The original of this contract ... will be deposited with the government of the Federal Republic of Germany ..."
Obviously, in addition to the government of the Federal Republic of Germany, there is also a government of the state “United Germany” that has ratified the treaty for “United Germany”.
In 1990, behind the backs of the population, the FRG was evidently transformed into a "Finanzagentur Bundeslastdeutsche GmbH".
Accordingly, we do not belong to the staff of “DEUTSCH”, but to the staff of a private-sector company that manages the entire state assets, but is only liable with 25 euros, since it is a limited liability company (GmbH).
The sole shareholder is the federal government, represented by the Federal Ministry of Finance. The actual date of establishment can be found in the extract from the commercial register: 29.08.1990/XNUMX/XNUMX.
Accordingly, the population of the local country belongs to at least 4 countries:
the German Reich (within the borders of 1937),
a country called DEUTSCH,
the Federal Republic of Germany within the borders of 1989,
as well as "United Germany" from 1990.
In addition, the population still belongs to the staff of the BRD-Finanzagentur GmbH, also from 1990 - but that is a company and not a country.
As the Federal Administrative Court found, you have to be able to determine the scope of a law without further ado, but who, with all this confusion, is actually still able to recognize which country you actually belong to and which laws apply to you !?
What is actually the case here?
That's a good question that is difficult to answer. We'll try anyway. According to our research, the situation is as follows:
According to information from The Hague, the “Weimar Constitution” of 11.08.1919 applies. It is valid in the version of January 30.01.1933, 22.05.1949 with the changes made by Allied legislation up to May XNUMX, XNUMX.
However, since the Weimar Constitution came about after the First World War under significant influence by the Allies and, according to international law, the legal status two days before the start of the war is decisive, international lawyers name the constitutional treaty of 1871 as the only legal basis for the German people. The territoriality of Germany defined by the Allies was and is the imperial borders of December 31.12.1937, XNUMX.
The “Federal Constitutional Court” confirmed this with a judgment of July 31.07.1973, XNUMX:
“It is stated that the German Reich survived the collapse of 1945 and did not perish either with the surrender or through the exercise of foreign state authority in Germany by the Allies.
It still has legal capacity, but is unable to act as a state as a whole due to a lack of organization.
"The FRG is not the legal successor to the German Reich." (Judgments 2 Bvl.6 / 56, 2 BvF1 / 73, 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85 (126); 6, 309, 336 and 363)
These judgments have never been revised and have not become obsolete due to the changed political situation in Europe.
The “Federal Republic of Germany” under occupation law was and is the simulation of a state.
That is nothing else than organized serious crime in the form of high treason against the population of the local country!
You see They see…
Television is totally boring botch. The reality is much more interesting!
YOU shouldn't really know anything about this reality and that's why people try to distract you from it with “football”, “farmer is looking for a wife”, “Sebastian Silbereisen”, “Hansi Hinterlader” and similar nonsense.
"You can fool some people all the time, all people some time, but never all people all the time."
(Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States (1809 to 1865)
The Germans are the most rightsless people in the world. Everyone knows that. Except the Germans.
We hope that with this article we have found some relief.
Reblog: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3878576088857160&set=a.259998730714932
Just in case anyone gets the impression that companies are stealing our money or our life energy through Corona?
##########################
If you like you can leave us a coffee for the effort and the time invested,
Thank you very much
As a precaution, the editors distance themselves from each article. The articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editors, rather they only serve to free opinion. Nobody is perfect and error is possible. In addition: it is only information and does not necessarily have the attention of the editors.
As an Amazon partner, the blog operator earns qualified sales via the Amazon links inserted in the blog. Almost all of this earnings are converted into animal feed.
To comment on posts or to rate them with stars, you have to registered and logged in be. Not registered yet?
forest power
☘️ Kills all kinds of disease-causing germs through oxidation
☘️ Eliminates and drains heavy metals and environmental toxins
☘️ Increases performance...
"Chlorine dioxide is the most effective bacteria killer known to man."
Follow us on Telegram
